Categories
In this Discussion
To get email notification of new content, change your preferences settings. Sign in first. Then click on the icon under your name called 'account options' and choose 'edit profile' in the dropdown menu. Now click on 'Notification preferences' in the new menu below your name. Under 'Category Notifications' click on the boxes under the Email heading as you desire.
Is there a treatment for parasites, or is one being planned?
Some of my notes from Dr. Mary Pellicer's presentation (in or before 2023):
"Most diseases have parasites somewhere in them
Most everyone has a huge internal resistance to clearing parasites
Just the same couple of generational traumas that make us all susceptible and make us want to pull the pathogens in
Same one generational trauma for one species
“You need this; this is the answer to your dreams; this is going to solve your _ problem (that you feel subconsiously that you have)”; they are here at our invitation
Clear the generational trauma, and pathogens are unappealing/ not interested/ you are not affected by them
Losing peak states is a Class 1-related prion problem"
//My extended family has problems with parasites, and much healing seems to be stuck until we get rid of them. I have been taking medicine, herbs, treatments, diet changes, etc. for a few years (many people take one or two treatments and they are clear), but they are still good and strong, especially after 5G started up, so all that Mary said makes sense. Besides, the parasite Mister Sweet in Dr. Who (The Crimson Horror episode) demonstrates that.
In The Parasite Pill pdf, a very deep and sick (double-meaning) look at parasites and their destructive effects, shows that millions just in the USA would benefit from parasite treatment, especially for a few species (such as T. gondii), so this might be an area of interest for the Institute.
How does one create a non-physical undesirable environment for parasites?
Have the generational trauma's for any species been discovered, is this being mapped out (perhaps for common ones)?
Will there be treatments for parasites?
Has there been any progress in overcoming prion problems?
Comments
The research team is working hard on this problem. Unfortunately, the level of resistance to letting go these parasites, even when they wreck our lives and we consciously want to get rid of them, is astoundingly high. We are working on getting it easier step by step...
Then, finding a treatment for a specific specie require a huge amount of work, and the team is already overworked. Therefore, there are a few applications on which they are working, on top of the more important fundamental humanity problems.
The good thing is, the theory predict that it will be possible to eliminate a whole class of species (so, all fungus, or all bacterias) all at once. But that requires fundamental breakthrough.
So, it is a balance between the importance of the disease, and the ressources available to make a treatment work.
Currently, the ISPS is undergoing testings for new protocols, mostly in the realm of psychotherapy.
It takes a lot of patience, but I'm optimistic that we will get there eventually.
I was thinking of parasites such as helminths (worms) and protozoans.
I am wondering if being able to get rid of all bacteria, funguses, and viruses is possible or desired.
According to Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer, at least a few types of bacteria (like TB, staph, and strep), fungi (like candida), and "viruses" are part of the intrinsic healing of the body when emotional trauma occurs and causes cancer/ . To get rid of them permanently might mean getting rid of the possibility of emotional shock trauma, which might be why eliminating a whole class of species is extremely difficult.
It also reminds me a little about Gaston Naessens's somatids and their form cycle. Also, IIRC, that people who didn't have them never got sick.
If bacteria, funguses, and viruses could all be permanently gotten rid of... maybe that would mean that that person would never get sick!
Yes, our model clearly says that we can become immune to all pathogens completely. There is probably one immunity state per class of pathogen (all fungi, all bacterias & ameobas, ...) but they are extremely rare, and difficult to work on.
In the meantime, we are slowly slowly getting better at eliminating pathogen species one at a time, but the order in which the research works depends on a special strategy and also on targeting pathogens that makes use resist healing. Many of these are wide-spread diseases, meaning almost every human being have those, and we consider them normal part of our beings, but they are not.
So, most time is spent on pathogens that impact consciousness the most, since otherwise it would take several decades to go through the hundreds of possible diseases...
But we might have a treatment one day for things such as candida, etc...
We also don't have time/ressource/talent to work on important problems such as smoking, selfishness, etc... so we are very limited for now.
I'll add to what Gaetan said and throw in my 2-cents. As Gaetan explained, our current approach gets rid of one species of infective organisms at a time. We derived this technique with organisms that were inside cells and inside the tissues of the body. As you are interested in gut infections - helminths (worms like flukes, tapeworms, or nematodes) and protozoans (amoeba, flagellate, ciliate, or sporozoan) - the question becomes 'does this approach work on gut pathogens?' I ask this because essentially the gut is 'outside' the body and not directly accessible to the immune system. (If you think topologically, we could in theory turn a person inside out so the gut was outside and the skin was inside.)
Interestingly, we do have two bits of data that says our approach still works inside the gut. The first data point was a gut bacterial infection in one of research team. When we healed the relevant trauma on the left side of the person (inherited from the mother), the dark film on the inner wall of the intestine went away - in alternating bands of dark infected gut with bands of clear gut. It turns out that for whatever reason, the gut is built from alternating chunks of tissue from the egg and sperm contributions. This was one heck of a surprise and tends to make us more confident of our observations, even aside from measuring symptom elimination.
The second data point was a candida infection. Again, one of the research team had this infection quite severely, with many symptoms (partly due to the buildup of aldehyde in their liver). It was quite creepy looking, as the infection was sending thick pseudopods through the gut wall into the blood stream of the patient. Again, after treatment on only the contribution from the mother, we observed the same alternating striping gut wall change.
[Having said that, candida is NOT a tested and released process! Far from it - this treatment is totally on our back burner as we have far more important projects ahead of it. We would have a ton more to do to make it a client-ready treatment, including making it easy for patients to do, phase 1 and phase 2 clinical safety trials, etc, etc.]
I'll add another comment about something that I hear from people a lot. The idea is that we need certain disease organisms to have the gut work properly. That is a whole big discussion, but I can weigh in on candida. Back in the 1980s I was reading that the typical person has a certain percentage of candida (I can't remember for sure now - that was 40 years ago - but I think it was grams of candida organism in the poop per body weight). So I got curious and looked up the original source of this statistic, and found it in a book at UC Davis medical library. It was from a study done by the US government back a decade or three earlier examining the poop of a LOT of soldiers. However, when I actually read the book, I found that they discovered that candida actually had a clear bimodal distribution in the soldiers. Many were infected, but if I recall correctly, around 1/3 had no detectible candida. (And they really looked! I pity those poor poop researchers...) The statistic that people were quoting was from that study that gave an AVERAGE of the infection over the entire soldier population! Regardless of whether they were infected or not. So in the years that followed, people just assume from this statistic that a candida infection is normal, due to this rather stupid ignorance of the original data... OK, getting off my soap box now...
But how about organisms like worms, ameba, and the like that swim around inside the gut? If they are not hooked into the gut tissue as in the two previous examples, what happens with our approach? Honestly, I don't know for certain, and won't say one way or the other till we test it. However, we do know one thing from biology that my colleague Kirsten just pointed out. You can detect those sorts of gut infections with blood tests that show a raised immune response (in most people, and generally after being infected a while). So that does suggest that the body's immune system might be able to get at them, perhaps by somehow pouring stuff into the gut to wipe them out. But again, that is only hypothetical, and testing would be required.
In North America, it would be darn useful to be immune to giardia from drinking stream water while hiking! Not to mention all those horrible gut worms you can get in the south pacific from eating raw fish (which I only found out years later after eating lots of delicious raw fish marinated in coconut and lime juice in Tahiti and other tropical islands). And so on...
All my best,
Grant McFetridge PhD